Contributor: cod

COINTELPRO Culture

An era of technetronicly induced paranoia has engulfed modern culture.  Americans now give new meaning to the term "shit house rat" and considering the vast filthy prison America has become it is no wonder.  Personally I have to spend some time thinking after someone tells me the time of day to analyze their answer for possible provocateurism.

Are we all now either shills, agents, dealer/informants, dangerous zombies, or useful idiots?  We sure have been conditioned to start to feel that way.  One of my main favorite sayings today is "The question isn't 'Am I paranoid?', The question is 'Am I paranoid enough.'".  Hopefully my answer to that question is yes.  And then we come full circle to the point of being paranoid of paranoia and then maybe the healing can start.

Unless you are Alan Watt and were born knowing the true nature of society at some point in your life you were confronted with and were no longer able to deny that which you had cleverly swept aside up till that point.  Or possibly you are reading this and aren't infected with the wave of acute political awareness that is sweeping the world so I'll include you too.  This is a major psychological experience to go through.  It happened to me two years ago and from month to month my clarity is still changing to the point that it is bewildering, it takes some time for all of this to settle in.  So it is no wonder that people start down many crazy paths during this experience, and it is no wonder the COINTELPRO operations setup to catch people in the Brotherhood of the Bell phase of life are so successful.  Anyway, what I am saying is why the hell wouldn't you be paranoid of everything and everyone during this phase of your life, where does the rabbit hole end?

As an avid user of the internets I enjoy talking online with people who have views similar to mine.  I like to do the occasional YouTube comments battle and so on.  I find more and more though a profound movement towards playing spot the infiltrator.  As I said above I have no problem with paranoia, anything is possible and many times it seems the better the story sounds the more likely there aint no coupe de' ville at the bottom of that cracker jack box.

The problem is there is what can be known and what can't be known.  As long as a person sticks to the facts and makes reasonable conclusions that have an aire of common sense to them I will stick with them and make the assumption they aren't trying to gain trust so they can betray it later.

At the end of the day what we may have learned in our latest lessons from the Banksters of doom is that we really shouldn't trust anyone, probably not even ourselves.  How many times have we ourselves been mislead?  I for one have gone down so many garden paths I could be a garden path tour guide.  Maybe this is what Machiavelli really meant about being a good prince or princess.  To rule our own domain we must have a certain ruthlessness.  That ruthlessness does not need to be about getting over on the next guy as the Banksters and their minions are convinced the meaning of life is about, but that ruthlessness can be about protecting your mind and your own little kingdom from the other ruthless characters that seem to be absolutely everywhere and sometimes so well disguised in all the things you ever wanted to hear.

So be ruthless in your honesty about the potential dangers your kingdom of one may encounter each day but also remember to remember to have a little paranoia about being paranoid as well to balance it all out.  Maybe someday or the next life we won't all have to think like a shit house rat just to survive if we do.

And Then On To The Real Part

The problem with paranoia is that 9 times out of 10 we are paranoid about x when y is closing in on us fast and we seem oblivious to y or have it on the back burner for x.  This is why organizing your paranoia is an important part of having a healthy ruthlessness in your protection of yourself.

At root this is the common man's most horrifying shortcoming, his abilities to defend himself intellectually are ghastly insufficient without careful and fastidious exercise of the faculty.  That is why we are always looking for the good Sheppard and fall to the farmers plans.  Sometimes I would like to blame god for giving us enough intellect to kill each other in mass but not enough common sense to realize when someone is conning us for a nickel.

Maybe in 20 years when man is finally free of this financier bankster cancer we can look back and be grateful the last 8,000 years happened because the individual finally grew up and started to take personal responsibility for making sure the "facts" he/she takes from society are valuable and just.

Comments refreshcmnts
(gravatar only)
Edit Comment

Please wait... loading

Reply To Comment

Please wait... loading

 
Powered By:MvcCms